COACHING REPORT · REAL EXAMPLE
DELIBERATE
Short film / narrative
OMELETO · 11K VIEWS · AUTO-DETECTED 100%
A narrative short composed and graded like a feature — perfect framing and clean image. The real problem is the mix: mastered far too quiet at around −30 LUFS, so it lands much softer than everything else in the feed, with a thin bitrate on top.
OVERALL · 13 THEMES · WEIGHTED FOR SHORT FILM
AT A GLANCE
Every theme, ranked by score.
Each theme is the average of its measures. The global score is then weighted for the auto-detected genre — for a short film / narrative, the weighting follows what matters most for that format.
| Theme | Score | /100 | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| DComposition & Framing | 100 | Excellent | |
| FAudio Quality & Balance | 100 | Excellent | |
| GVoice & Speech | 100 | Excellent | |
| LAccessibility & Safety | 100 | Excellent | |
| AExposure & Color | 94 | Excellent | |
| HEditing & Rhythm | 84 | Strong | |
| JNarrative Structure | 78 | Good | |
| CStability & Motion | 72 | Good | |
| BSharpness & Technical | 57 | Fair | |
| IOn-screen Text | 51 | Weak | |
| KPlatform & Metadata | 50 | Weak | |
| EAudio Loudness | 48 | Weak |
How to read this report
Each measure is scored out of 100 against technical references (upload standards, EBU R128 loudness, WCAG legibility…) and subjective analysis. Measures are grouped into themes (theme = average of its measures); the global score is a weighted average based on the detected genre. A score is decision-support, not a popularity ranking.
YOUR PRIORITIES · 5 ADVISORIES
Fix these first, in this order.
The lowest-scoring measures against the standards for this genre — ranked by how much they drag the score.
1
Integrated loudness — 0/100 · -29.9 LUFS (cible -14)
How — Master toward ~−14 LUFS integrated so the platform doesn’t crush or quiet it.
2
Encoding (codec & bitrate) — 0/100 · av1, 0.3 Mbps (cible av1 ~4)
How — Raise the bitrate to keep AV1/H.264 clean of compression artefacts.
3
Text legibility (contrast) — 2/100 · contraste médian 4.0:1 · 59% sous 4.5:1
How — Add a stroke, drop-shadow or semi-opaque plate behind text (aim ≥ 4.5:1).
4
Loudness range (dynamics) — 5/100 · 17.7 LU
How — Even out the loud/quiet swings between music, voice and ambience.
5
Out-of-focus shots — 6/100 · 43% de plans au point manqué (plans sombres écartés)
How — Lock focus (or eye-AF) on the subject and cut the softest grabs.
STRENGTHS · KEEP DOING THIS
Composition & Framing — 100
Subject placement, framing. Scored 100/100 for this genre.
Audio Quality & Balance — 100
Cleanliness, balance, noise. Scored 100/100 for this genre.
Voice & Speech — 100
Pace, fillers, silences. Scored 100/100 for this genre.
SCORES BY THEME · A–M
Thirteen themes, each on a 0–100 dial.
Exposure & Color
Brightness, contrast, white balance.
Sharpness & Technical
Focus and image quality.
Stability & Motion
Camera steadiness, movement.
Composition & Framing
Subject placement, framing.
Audio Loudness
Level & upload-standard compliance.
Audio Quality & Balance
Cleanliness, balance, noise.
Voice & Speech
Pace, fillers, silences.
Editing & Rhythm
Cuts, pacing, dynamics.
On-screen Text
Presence and legibility.
Narrative Structure
Hook, body, ending.
Platform & Metadata
Resolution, codec, aspect.
Accessibility & Safety
Captions, photosensitivity.
STRUCTURE & RHYTHM
The whole video, on one timeline.
This frieze unrolls the whole video left to right, from the real analysis: structure (hook vs body), editing rhythm (cut density), audio level, and which passages show a face to camera vs b-roll.
Structure
Rhythm
Sound
Face
0:002:535:468:3911:3214:25
HookFace to cameraB-rollAudio level
CHAPTER SUMMARY · 7 SECTIONS DETECTED
Ch.10:00–0:36Chapter 1 — You Hello Ben, hmm Alice Present What oh my god
Ch.20:36–7:12Chapter 2 — Look at you You look great. Oh Yeah, I try Everything looks the same Yeah, well, you know more things change more things stay the same same…
Ch.37:12–8:24Chapter 3 — Having you not even a little You don't want to tell anybody Alice trust me You know How it'll go if you make this public I You deserve to be…
Ch.48:24–10:13Chapter 4 — I want to forgive you What do you think the apologies for You Know Apology implies guilt. You are guilty. I didn't do anything if I wanted t…
Ch.510:13–10:49Chapter 5 — You're not here out of some lust for vengeance or misguided sense of justice. This is justice And I'm sorry I I am
Ch.610:49–13:49Chapter 6 — You knew this wouldn't work I Couldn't know for sure No, you knew But you came anyway Why I Had to try That's not why Don't don't look at me…
Ch.713:49–14:25Chapter 7 — You You You
Sections are auto-detected from cut density and audio energy; the line shown is the first thing said in each span.
STORY-BOARD
One real frame per detected section, pulled straight from the source at the timestamp shown.
0:00
Chapitre 1
0:36
Chapitre 2
7:12
Chapitre 3
8:24
Chapitre 4
10:13
Chapitre 5
10:49
Chapitre 6
TRANSCRIPTION · EXCERPT
Auto-transcribed locally (whisper). Language: EN · 887 words · 48% speech.
You
I'm really happy you're here, you know
You chose not to and what now you're blaming me
You know if you you want to hurt me
And I'm sorry
You
DETAILED ANALYSIS
Theme by theme, measure by measure.
Expand any theme for its measures, values and scores. The blue boxes explain the technical terms.
DComposition & Framing100
Good
Rule of thirds / placementécart au point fort 10%100
Info
Frame clutterdensité de contours 7%
Good
Aspect ratio16:9 → 16:9 (paysage)100
FAudio Quality & Balance100
Good
Background noise / hissplancher ~-75 dBFS100
Good
Stereo balance+0.0 dB (droite)100
GVoice & Speech100
Info
Speaking pace129 mots/min · 48% de parole (dialogue narratif)
Good
Filler words1 remplisseurs (0.1/100 mots)100
Good to know Filler words are “um / like / you know”. A high rate per 100 words distracts and undercuts authority.
Info
Breathing / silences43 silence(s) > 3s · plus long 29s (normal en narratif)
LAccessibility & Safety100
Good
Photosensitivity (screen)3 transitions lumineuses fortes (~0/min, éch. 0.3 img/s)100
AExposure & Color94
Info
Exposure (overall)luminance moyenne 20% · exposition volontairement basse (ambiance)
Good
Blown highlights0.5% de pixels cramés100
Info
Crushed shadows30.2% de pixels bouchés · noirs profonds assumés
Watch
Dynamic range usedétalement 71%71
Good
Contrastcontraste RMS 0.21100
Info
White balancedominante froide (bleue) 14% · étalonnage chaud/froid (parti pris)
Good to know White balance is the overall colour temperature — a cast pulls the whole image warm or cool.
Good
Saturationsaturation moyenne 29%100
Info
Color consistencydérive 37% · étalonnage qui évolue selon les scènes
Good
Chroma noiseindice de bruit couleur 0.4100
HEditing & Rhythm84
Info
Shot segmentation114 plans · 7.8 coupes/min
Good
Average shot length (ASL)7.6s (cible 2-15s · film)100
Good to know A “shot” is the span between two cuts. ASL is the average shot length — lower means a faster cut.
Good
Shot-length varietycoefficient de variation 0.87100
Info
Rhythm curvedynamique 0.7 (coupes / 5s)
Good
Hook strength (0–30s)5 coupes en 30s100
Watch
Pattern interrupts61% du temps en plans longs (>8s)59
Watch
Editing progressiondécélération (variation 49% entre tiers)62
Info
Jump cuts1 plans < 1s (1% des plans)
Info
B-roll / face-cam ratio~40% b-roll · 60% face caméra
JNarrative Structure78
Good
Structure (hook · body · outro)accroche présente · pas de fin nette77
Good
Chaptering7 section(s) narrative(s) détectée(s)100
Info
Branding (intro / outro)carton d'intro · pas d'outro
Info
Call-to-action (ending)CTA probable en fin (parlé)
Watch
Sustained engagement / tensionaccroche, relances, variété, audio58
CStability & Motion72
Info
Stabilitynon notée à cet échantillonnage (0.34 img/s, ~3s entre images) — mouvement inter-plan, pas du tremblement
Good to know Measuring true shake needs frames close together in time; on long videos it’s read from motion fluidity.
Info
Micro-jittersaccades résiduelles 37.2 px (inhérent à la caméra portée)
Fix
Motion fluidityirrégularité de vitesse 1.3345
Info
Movement typecaméra à l'épaule (handheld)
Good
Horizon levelhorizon ~+0.0°100
BSharpness & Technical57
Fix
Sharpness / focussujet net sur 57% des plans exploitables · plans sombres écartés20
Good to know “Sharpness” is how crisp the detail is — soft footage often means missed focus or an upscale.
Fix
Out-of-focus shots43% de plans au point manqué (plans sombres écartés)6
Good
Noise (ISO grain)sigma bruit 0.2100
Watch
Compression artifactsblocking 11.5% (grille 8×8)58
Good
Real definition (upscale?)détail HF 25.8% · ~1080p effectifs / 1080p100
IOn-screen Text51
Info
On-screen text presencetexte sur ~97% des plans · 153 incrustations lues
Fix
Text legibility (contrast)contraste médian 4.0:1 · 59% sous 4.5:12
Good to know Contrast is the brightness gap between text and what’s behind it; ~4.5:1 keeps it readable.
Good
Line lengthligne médiane 7 car. (max 17)100
KPlatform & Metadata50
Good
Resolution & frame rate1920x1080 @ 24fps100
Fix
Encoding (codec & bitrate)av1, 0.3 Mbps (cible av1 ~4)0
EAudio Loudness48
Fix
Integrated loudness-29.9 LUFS (cible -14)0
Good to know LUFS measures perceived loudness over the whole video. Platforms normalize toward −14 LUFS.
Good
True peak-7.8 dBTP (max -1)100
Good to know True peak (dBTP) estimates the real peak between samples; over −1 risks clipping on transcode.
Fix
Loudness range (dynamics)17.7 LU5
Good
Audio clipping0.00% d'échantillons saturés100
Fix
Level consistencysauts de niveau jusqu'à 17 dB (p95 10 dB)39
YOUR TURN
Get a report like this for your video.
Same depth, weighted for whatever you make. Get early access for early access.