COACHING REPORT · REAL EXAMPLE
So This is Peak Smartphone
Talking-head / tutorial
MKBHD · 4.7M VIEWS · AUTO-DETECTED 100%
A flagship tech review: textbook captions, a clean filler-free delivery and a confident edit. What costs it points is low-contrast on-screen text over busy footage and a little residual camera jitter — both quick fixes in post.
OVERALL · 13 THEMES · WEIGHTED FOR TALKING-HEAD
AT A GLANCE
Every theme, ranked by score.
Each theme is the average of its measures. The global score is then weighted for the auto-detected genre — for a talking-head / tutorial, the weighting follows what matters most for that format.
| Theme | Score | /100 | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| LAccessibility & Safety | 100 | Excellent | |
| GVoice & Speech | 92 | Excellent | |
| KPlatform & Metadata | 91 | Excellent | |
| FAudio Quality & Balance | 87 | Strong | |
| HEditing & Rhythm | 86 | Strong | |
| AExposure & Color | 86 | Strong | |
| BSharpness & Technical | 85 | Strong | |
| EAudio Loudness | 83 | Strong | |
| JNarrative Structure | 83 | Strong | |
| DComposition & Framing | 68 | Fair | |
| CStability & Motion | 60 | Fair | |
| IOn-screen Text | 50 | Weak |
How to read this report
Each measure is scored out of 100 against technical references (upload standards, EBU R128 loudness, WCAG legibility…) and subjective analysis. Measures are grouped into themes (theme = average of its measures); the global score is a weighted average based on the detected genre. A score is decision-support, not a popularity ranking.
YOUR PRIORITIES · 5 ADVISORIES
Fix these first, in this order.
The lowest-scoring measures against the standards for this genre — ranked by how much they drag the score.
1
Micro-jitter — 0/100 · saccades résiduelles 174.1 px (p75)
How — Smooth residual shake in the edit, or improve the handheld grip.
2
Text legibility (contrast) — 0/100 · contraste médian 2.6:1 · 94% sous 4.5:1
How — Add a stroke, drop-shadow or semi-opaque plate behind text (aim ≥ 4.5:1).
3
Aspect ratio — 19/100 · 2:1 → 16:9 (paysage)
How — Match the aspect ratio to the target platform.
4
Color consistency — 26/100 · dérive 27%
How — Shot-match hue and exposure across cuts for a consistent grade.
5
Editing progression — 46/100 · rythme stable (variation 20% entre tiers)
How — Even out the pace so the opening isn’t slower than the body.
STRENGTHS · KEEP DOING THIS
Accessibility & Safety — 100
Captions, photosensitivity. Scored 100/100 for this genre.
Voice & Speech — 92
Pace, fillers, silences. Scored 92/100 for this genre.
SCORES BY THEME · A–M
Thirteen themes, each on a 0–100 dial.
Exposure & Color
Brightness, contrast, white balance.
Sharpness & Technical
Focus and image quality.
Stability & Motion
Camera steadiness, movement.
Composition & Framing
Subject placement, framing.
Audio Loudness
Level & upload-standard compliance.
Audio Quality & Balance
Cleanliness, balance, noise.
Voice & Speech
Pace, fillers, silences.
Editing & Rhythm
Cuts, pacing, dynamics.
On-screen Text
Presence and legibility.
Narrative Structure
Hook, body, ending.
Platform & Metadata
Resolution, codec, aspect.
Accessibility & Safety
Captions, photosensitivity.
STRUCTURE & RHYTHM
The whole video, on one timeline.
This frieze unrolls the whole video left to right, from the real analysis: structure (hook vs body), editing rhythm (cut density), audio level, and which passages show a face to camera vs b-roll.
Structure
Rhythm
Sound
Face
0:002:395:197:5810:3713:17
HookFace to cameraB-rollAudio level
CHAPTER SUMMARY · 5 SECTIONS DETECTED
Ch.10:00–3:19Chapter 1 — So this is peak slab phone. For now, anyway. We gotta talk about it. So this is the Oppo Find X9 Ultra. By the time you see this I've been t…
Ch.23:19–3:52Chapter 2 — last till the end of the school day. They were terrible batteries, but phones have gotten more efficient and batteries have gotten bigger an…
Ch.33:52–8:18Chapter 3 — silicon carbon batteries came along like in the last two years. And so in a few short months the normal flagship battery size went from 5000…
Ch.48:18–8:51Chapter 4 — and as good quality as a regular camera. Those are two different things. The irony with this, you know, Oppo is they clearly want you to thi…
Ch.58:51–13:17Chapter 5 — whole point of an incredible smartphone camera system is to be the most capable, versatile, convenient camera possible. No matter where you…
Sections are auto-detected from cut density and audio energy; the line shown is the first thing said in each span.
STORY-BOARD
One real frame per detected section, pulled straight from the source at the timestamp shown.
0:00
Chapitre 1
3:19
Chapitre 2
3:52
Chapitre 3
8:18
Chapitre 4
8:51
Chapitre 5
TRANSCRIPTION · EXCERPT
Auto-transcribed locally (whisper). Language: EN · 2,475 words · 99% speech.
So this is peak slab phone. For now, anyway. We gotta talk about it.
it. And now we've essentially settled on a large, flat, bright OLED. High refresh rate,
over year these days are like in the highest end that you might notice in like graphically
cameras. There's also a second zoom, there's a 50 megapixel 10x camera with sensor shift stabilization,
so great. I'm killing it. That's what computational photography is trying to do. A lot of us, you know,
Peak Slab Phone in 2026? Catch you in the next one. Peace.
DETAILED ANALYSIS
Theme by theme, measure by measure.
Expand any theme for its measures, values and scores. The blue boxes explain the technical terms.
LAccessibility & Safety100
Good
Photosensitivity (screen)17 transitions lumineuses fortes (~1/min, éch. 0.4 img/s)100
GVoice & Speech92
Good
Speaking pace189 mots/min · 99% de parole76
Good
Filler words0 remplisseurs (0.0/100 mots)100
Good to know Filler words are “um / like / you know”. A high rate per 100 words distracts and undercuts authority.
Good
Breathing / silences0 pause(s) > 3s · plus longue 1s100
KPlatform & Metadata91
Good
Resolution & frame rate3840x1920 @ 30fps100
Good
Encoding (codec & bitrate)av1, 3.8 Mbps (cible av1 ~20)82
FAudio Quality & Balance87
Good
Background noise / hissplancher ~-53 dBFS76
Good
Stereo balance+0.0 dB (droite)100
HEditing & Rhythm86
Info
Shot segmentation136 plans · 10.2 coupes/min
Good
Average shot length (ASL)5.9s (cible 3-20s · talking_head)100
Good to know A “shot” is the span between two cuts. ASL is the average shot length — lower means a faster cut.
Good
Shot-length varietycoefficient de variation 1.02100
Info
Rhythm curvedynamique 0.8 (coupes / 5s)
Good
Hook strength (0–30s)7 coupes en 30s100
Good
Pattern interrupts50% du temps en plans longs (>8s)88
Fix
Editing progressionrythme stable (variation 20% entre tiers)46
Info
Jump cuts6 plans < 1s (4% des plans)
Info
B-roll / face-cam ratio~51% b-roll · 49% face caméra
AExposure & Color86
Good
Exposure (overall)luminance moyenne 44%100
Good
Blown highlights1.1% de pixels cramés100
Good
Crushed shadows0.5% de pixels bouchés100
Good
Dynamic range usedétalement 77%77
Good
Contrastcontraste RMS 0.21100
Watch
White balancedominante chaude (rouge) 10%72
Good to know White balance is the overall colour temperature — a cast pulls the whole image warm or cool.
Good
Saturationsaturation moyenne 33%100
Fix
Color consistencydérive 27%26
Good
Chroma noiseindice de bruit couleur 0.8100
BSharpness & Technical85
Watch
Sharpness / focussujet net sur 85% des plans exploitables51
Good to know “Sharpness” is how crisp the detail is — soft footage often means missed focus or an upscale.
Good
Out-of-focus shots15% de plans au point manqué (plans sombres écartés)78
Good
Noise (ISO grain)sigma bruit 0.4100
Good
Compression artifactsblocking 2.1% (grille 8×8)100
Good
Real definition (upscale?)détail HF 29.6% · ~2160p effectifs / 1920p100
EAudio Loudness83
Watch
Integrated loudness-17.7 LUFS (cible -14)66
Good to know LUFS measures perceived loudness over the whole video. Platforms normalize toward −14 LUFS.
Good
True peak-0.7 dBTP (max -1)85
Good to know True peak (dBTP) estimates the real peak between samples; over −1 risks clipping on transcode.
Good
Loudness range (dynamics)4.4 LU100
Good
Audio clipping0.00% d'échantillons saturés100
Watch
Level consistencysauts de niveau jusqu'à 21 dB (p95 7 dB)68
JNarrative Structure83
Good
Structure (hook · body · outro)accroche présente · pas de fin nette77
Good
Chaptering5 section(s) narrative(s) détectée(s)100
Info
Branding (intro / outro)pas d'intro · pas d'outro
Info
Call-to-action (ending)CTA probable en fin (parlé)
Watch
Sustained engagement / tensionaccroche, relances, variété, audio74
DComposition & Framing68
Good
Rule of thirds / placementécart au point fort 5%100
Info
Frame clutterdensité de contours 13%
Good
Headroom / face framingespace au-dessus de la tête ~19%85
Fix
Aspect ratio2:1 → 16:9 (paysage)19
CStability & Motion60
Info
Stabilitynon notée à cet échantillonnage (0.38 img/s, ~3s entre images) — mouvement inter-plan, pas du tremblement
Good to know Measuring true shake needs frames close together in time; on long videos it’s read from motion fluidity.
Fix
Micro-jittersaccades résiduelles 174.1 px (p75)0
Good
Motion fluidityirrégularité de vitesse 0.7683
Info
Movement typecaméra à l'épaule (handheld)
Good
Horizon levelhorizon ~+0.0°100
IOn-screen Text50
Info
On-screen text presencetexte sur ~22% des plans · 84 incrustations lues
Fix
Text legibility (contrast)contraste médian 2.6:1 · 94% sous 4.5:10
Good to know Contrast is the brightness gap between text and what’s behind it; ~4.5:1 keeps it readable.
Good
Line lengthligne médiane 6 car. (max 24)100
YOUR TURN
Get a report like this for your video.
Same depth, weighted for whatever you make. Get early access for early access.